1,784 signatures have now been delivered to our MLA Jennifer Rice!

#ScraptheTaxCap

#ScraptheTaxCap#ScraptheTaxCap#ScraptheTaxCap
  • About the Port Tax Cap
  • How it Costs You
  • Fact Checks + Q&A
  • SUBSCRIBE FOR UPDATES
  • More
    • About the Port Tax Cap
    • How it Costs You
    • Fact Checks + Q&A
    • SUBSCRIBE FOR UPDATES

#ScraptheTaxCap

#ScraptheTaxCap#ScraptheTaxCap#ScraptheTaxCap
  • About the Port Tax Cap
  • How it Costs You
  • Fact Checks + Q&A
  • SUBSCRIBE FOR UPDATES

HOW THE PORT TAX CAP COMES AT YOUR EXPENSE.

Despite hosting the 3rd largest port in Canada, Prince Rupert has some of the highest taxes in BC.

Have you ever wondered how it's possible that Prince Rupert has a $600 million infrastructure deficit while the local port economy handles $60 billion per year in international trade?

The Port Tax Cap is not fair for Prince Rupert.

Rio Tinto paid Kitimat $16.1 million more taxes than all capped Prince Rupert terminals, combined.

With no Port Tax Cap, Kitimat can charge major industry more while homes & businesses pay much less.

With no Port Tax Cap, Kitimat can charge major industry more while homes & businesses pay much less.

In other words, a single industrial taxpayer in Kitimat is paying more than 5x the property taxes than DP World, Prince Rupert Grain, Trigon & Pinnacle Pellet, combined.

With no Port Tax Cap, Kitimat can charge major industry more while homes & businesses pay much less.

With no Port Tax Cap, Kitimat can charge major industry more while homes & businesses pay much less.

With no Port Tax Cap, Kitimat can charge major industry more while homes & businesses pay much less.

Rio Tinto Alcan in Kitimat is currently being charged a major industrial mill rate that is 36% more than the cap that Prince Rupert is forced to charge. As a result, Kitimat homeowners are being charged a mill rate that 87% less than in Prince Rupert, while business owners in Kitimat are being charged a mill rate that is 73% less than Prince Rupert. 

The Port Tax Cap is not fair for local propane terminals.

2 major industrial facilities are paying $2.4 million per year more than all the others, combined.

The two propane facilities on Ridley Island and Watson Island are currently being charged a major industrial mill rate that is 129% more than the cap that Prince Rupert is forced to charge other port terminals. The only difference between them is the type of product that they ship. As a result, only two industrial taxpayers are paying $2.4 million more per year in taxes than the container port, coal, grain, and pellet export facilities, combined.

The container terminal's owners benefit from the Tax Cap.

The 3rd largest container port in Canada is growing fast while their property taxes are going down.

The container terminal has spent millions to expand their operation, growing trade volumes by 10x since 2010. Yet in that same time period, their property tax bill actually decreased by 17%. In other words, $154,152 of tax burden was shifted onto homeowners and small businesses.

The grain terminal's owners benefit from the Port Tax Cap.

14 years ago, they were paying almost $400,000 more in property taxes than they are now.

Each year that the grain terminal paid less in taxes, the additional burden was forced onto homeowners and small businesses to the tune of nearly $400,000 per year!

The pellet facility's owners benefit from the Port Tax Cap.

Their property tax bill has gone down an average of almost $15,000 per year for the past 6 years.

The Pinnacle Pellet facility is paying 19% less in property taxes today than they were in 2017, while their exports are up 32% during the same time period.

Homeowners in Prince Rupert are bearing more tax burden.

Since 2004, homeowners have paid 2.2x more in taxes than all capped port properties, combined.

Since 2004, homeowners have paid 2.2x more in taxes than all capped port properties, combined.

Since 2004, homeowners have paid 2.2x more in taxes than all capped port properties, combined.

Since '04, homeowners have collectively paid $119.6M in taxes, while capped port industries paid less than half: $53.7M.


Source: City of Prince Rupert Financials



In Kitimat last year, Rio Tinto alone paid 4.1x more in taxes than all residential taxpayers.

Since 2004, homeowners have paid 2.2x more in taxes than all capped port properties, combined.

Since 2004, homeowners have paid 2.2x more in taxes than all capped port properties, combined.

Just last year alone, Rio Tinto in Kitimat contributed $19.8 million in taxes, compared to $4.8 million from homeowners.


Compare this to Prince Rupert where last year, all capped port industries combined paid $3.7 million in taxes, while homeowners paid $7.1 million. 


Source: City of Prince Rupert Audited Financial Statements; Rio Tinto Alcan Taxes Paid 2021; District of Kitimat Audited Financial Statements



You pay more taxes because they pay less.

Average home assessments are up 116% since 2013 while capped port industries are paying less.

Mostly as a result of the growing local port-related economy, the assessed value of the average home in Prince Rupert has gone up 116% since 2013, from $180,000 to $389,000.


Yet during that same time period, despite massive increases in cargo volumes and hundreds of millions of dollars of government/private sector investment, the assessed value of capped port properties has declined.


Source: BC Assessment

Small businesses in Prince Rupert are getting a bad deal.

For every $1 in taxes you paid since '04, capped port properties paid only $0.65 cents, combined.

For every $1 in taxes you paid since '04, capped port properties paid only $0.65 cents, combined.

For every $1 in taxes you paid since '04, capped port properties paid only $0.65 cents, combined.

Since '04, businesses have collectively paid $82.22M in taxes, while capped port industries paid $53.7M.


Source: City of Prince Rupert Financials


As a small business owner, you rightfully expect that if you invest in a new roof or exterior to your building, your assessed values and property taxes will increase. But for capped port properties, they are allowed to grow their business significantly while depreciating their assets. 

In Kitimat last year, for every $1 in taxes paid by local businesses, Rio Tinto alone paid $8.60.

For every $1 in taxes you paid since '04, capped port properties paid only $0.65 cents, combined.

For every $1 in taxes you paid since '04, capped port properties paid only $0.65 cents, combined.

In 2021, Rio Tinto in Kitimat contributed $19.8 million in taxes, compared to only $2.3 million from all local businesses combined. 


Source: District of Kitimat Financials


Compare this to Prince Rupert where all capped port industries combined paid $3.7 million in taxes while businesses contributed $4.9 million. 

The Port Tax Cap is costing port workers money.

Part of your paycheque is going to the terminals you are working at.

As a Longshore worker, you get paid for a call out to a port terminal to get a ship tied up.


You use your hard-earned paycheques to buy a house. You come home from work one day to find your property taxes have gone up, again. 


That's because the port terminal you worked at paid less property taxes than they did last year as a direct result of the Port Tax Cap. Now, you're forced to pay more. 


To make matters worse, part of your paycheque was deducted for provincial income taxes, which pays for the $1.8 million grant the Province pays to the City for lost tax revenue.

Sign Up to Receive Updates

Click Here

Connect With Us

Copyright © 2023 #ScraptheTaxCap - All Rights Reserved.

  • About the Port Tax Cap
  • How it Costs You
  • Fact Checks + Q&A
  • SUBSCRIBE FOR UPDATES

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept

1,784 signatures have been delivered to our MLA.

Sign up now to receive updates.

SUBSCRIBE HERE